Everyone in the QA space is currently hyper-focused on the rapid rise of artificial intelligence, from banks to vendors to regulators. More and more often the term GenAI pops up, but what exactly is the difference between AI and GenAI in software testing? Let’s dive in.
AI (Artificial Intelligence) and GenAI (Generative AI) both play significant roles, but they have different applications and approaches.
AI in software testing
AI in software testing generally refers to the use of machine learning, data analytics, and automation to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of testing processes. It can be used for tasks like:
Test Automation: AI can automate repetitive testing tasks like regression testing, ensuring that the software is functioning as expected after updates or bug fixes.
Predictive Analytics: AI can predict potential areas of failure by analyzing past data, helping to focus testing efforts on more critical parts of the software.
Test Optimization: AI can optimize the selection of test cases, ensuring comprehensive coverage while reducing unnecessary tests, making the process faster and more cost-effective.
Defect Prediction and Bug Detection: AI models can be trained to identify defects in code, helping testers find issues that may not be easily noticeable with traditional testing methods.
GenAI
Generative AI, on the other hand, is a more advanced form of AI that involves creating new content or generating solutions. In the context of software testing, GenAI could be used in more creative or complex tasks, including:
Test Case Generation: GenAI can automatically generate test cases based on software requirements or user stories, allowing for dynamic and more exhaustive testing.
Synthetic Data Generation: GenAI can generate realistic synthetic data that can be used to test the software, especially when sensitive or real-world data is unavailable or restricted.
Automated Bug Fixes: Some GenAI models can even go beyond detecting issues by generating potential fixes or solutions to identified problems, streamlining the debugging process.
Dynamic Testing Scripts Creation: GenAI can also generate or adapt testing scripts on the fly based on software changes or evolving test conditions, minimizing manual intervention.
Key differences
Scope of Application: AI is generally more focused on optimization, prediction, and automation, whereas GenAI is more about creating new data, test cases, and potentially even code modifications.
Level of Automation: GenAI takes automation to a higher level by generating test cases and scripts autonomously, while AI in testing focuses more on improving efficiency and accuracy within existing testing frameworks.
Creativity and Adaptability: GenAI is typically more adaptive and capable of handling creative problem-solving tasks, while AI in testing might be more rule-based and data-driven.
In short, AI enhances the existing testing workflows, whereas GenAI goes a step further by generating new testing content and solutions.
NEXT MONTH

Why not become a QA Financial subscriber? It’s entirely FREE
* Receive our weekly newsletter * Priority invitations to our Forum events *
COMING UP IN MARCH
QA Financial is delighted to announce that Tal Barmeir will join us as a speaker at the QA Financial Forum Toronto 2025 Places are limited – register today.

DO NOT MISS

READ MORE
- Automation is rapidly taking hold of banks’ QA strategies
- ‘Let’s redefine what quality assurance means’, says QA Mentor CEO
- Deep Dive: why do most AI testing projects fail to scale?
- Leapwork co-founder warns ‘AI is not in a state we can rely on’
- Ozone API eyes Australian banks with ProductCloud deal