Quantum computing has long been presented as a future tool for banks hoping to model risk more realistically, optimise portfolios faster and simulate complex market events beyond the reach of traditional computing systems.
But for QA and software testing teams in financial services, the technology has often remained too theoretical, too unstable and too distant from production environments to warrant serious operational attention.
That may be starting to change, if it’s up to one of Britain’s largest banks and a young AI startup.
HSBC and quantum middleware startup Haiqu announced peer-reviewed research this week that demonstrated a scalable way to load real-world financial probability distributions onto quantum hardware, overcoming what has widely been viewed as one of the biggest barriers to practical quantum finance applications.
The work, published in Physical Review Research, focused on a problem known as quantum state preparation: the process of encoding classical financial data into quantum states so that algorithms can process them.
The challenge has become increasingly important for banks exploring future applications in areas such as risk modelling, stress simulations, portfolio optimisation and scenario analysis involving sudden market crashes or extreme price movements.
Until now, the data-loading process itself has often generated quantum circuits too large and complex to run on current-generation hardware.
The HSBC-Haiqu research attempted to solve that bottleneck through scalable encoding techniques that produced substantially shallower circuits capable of running on noisy quantum systems.
For QA and software testing teams, however, the implications extend well beyond quantum computing itself.
From deterministic testing to probabilistic validation
One of the most significant aspects of the research was not simply that the circuits could run, but that the resulting outputs could be statistically validated on existing hardware.
The researchers used matrix product state methods to construct compact circuits capable of encoding smooth probability distributions directly into quantum states.
The approach was then validated on finance-relevant models including heavy-tailed Lévy distributions, which are commonly used in banking and trading environments to model extreme market events.
On IBM quantum hardware, the researchers said circuits of up to 25 qubits produced samples that passed standard statistical tests, demonstrating that the systems could reproduce the probability distributions required by financial models in practice.
That distinction matters for QA teams because it changes the nature of software testing itself.
In traditional banking systems, testing frameworks generally validate deterministic outputs, where a system either produces the expected result or it does not.
Quantum systems instead introduce inherently probabilistic behaviour, meaning validation increasingly becomes statistical rather than binary.
As a result, QA workflows in financial services may eventually evolve toward tolerance-based testing, probabilistic assertions and distribution-level validation methods more commonly associated with quantitative model risk management than conventional software QA.
The research also highlighted a growing convergence between software testing, resilience engineering and advanced mathematical validation techniques.
“Preparing complex probability distributions efficiently is a key step in many quantum algorithms,” said Dr. Philip Intallura, Group Head of Quantum Technologies at HSBC. “
This work shows how they can be implemented with much shallower quantum circuits, bringing practical applications such as financial risk modelling closer.”
Another important implication for QA teams is the central role of hardware instability itself.
Unlike classical enterprise systems, where unpredictable noise is usually treated as a defect or infrastructure problem, quantum computing environments operate under persistent physical noise conditions that cannot simply be eliminated.
The HSBC-Haiqu research explicitly focused on running the circuits under “realistic device noise”, with the researchers noting that circuits up to 64 qubits were able to reproduce qualitative features of the target distributions despite the instability inherent in current-generation hardware.
“One of the biggest practical barriers is getting realistic financial data onto today’s quantum hardware.”
– Mykola Maksymenko
For financial services QA teams, that introduces a fundamentally different testing paradigm.
Rather than validating systems under ideal conditions alone, future quantum QA frameworks may need to assess how models behave under varying levels of noise, whether tail-risk scenarios remain statistically accurate and how deviations propagate through probabilistic systems operating in unstable hardware environments.
The shift mirrors broader trends already emerging in resilience engineering, chaos testing and operational resilience programmes across banking.
Under frameworks such as the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), regulators are increasingly focused on demonstrating how systems behave under degraded or disrupted conditions rather than simply verifying baseline functionality.
Quantum systems may eventually push that philosophy even further.
Test data management
The research also exposed another issue likely to resonate strongly with QA and testing teams: test data management.
According to the researchers, one of the main obstacles in quantum finance has been the difficulty of loading large real-world financial datasets onto quantum systems without overwhelming hardware limitations.
To address this, the paper introduced a sampling-based workflow designed to avoid storing full discretised datasets in classical memory while still generating larger encoding circuits.
That creates a new set of governance and QA questions for financial institutions.
“One of the biggest practical barriers is getting realistic financial data onto today’s quantum hardware,” explained Mykola Maksymenko, Co-founder and CTO of Haiqu.
“This work shows a scalable path around that barrier and helps move quantum finance workflows from theory toward execution.”
As banks continue to strengthen auditability, traceability and explainability controls around AI and advanced analytics systems, quantum workflows may eventually require similar evidence-generation frameworks capable of demonstrating how input distributions were generated, how scenarios were reproduced and how statistical validity was verified.
For QA leaders, the challenge increasingly becomes not simply testing the application layer, but validating the integrity of the mathematical and probabilistic foundations underneath it.
Operational reality
While practical large-scale quantum computing in banking remains years away, the HSBC-Haiqu work reflects a broader shift already underway across financial services: the gradual movement of quantum computing discussions away from purely theoretical research and toward operational feasibility, validation and governance.
For QA and software testing teams, that means quantum computing may no longer sit entirely outside the scope of enterprise testing strategy.
Instead, the technology may eventually introduce entirely new categories of validation centred around probabilistic model assurance, non-deterministic system verification and resilience testing for noisy computational environments.
The research also suggests that the future role of QA in banking could extend far deeper into mathematical validation and model governance than many traditional software testing teams have historically operated.
If quantum finance applications continue advancing toward production-grade environments, the ability to prove that probabilistic systems behave reliably under noisy conditions may become just as important as the algorithms themselves.
THIS MONTH
Why not become a QA Financial subscriber?
It’s entirely FREE
* Receive our weekly newsletter every Wednesday * Get priority invitations to our Forum events *
REGULATION & COMPLIANCE
Looking for more news on regulations and compliance requirements driving developments in software quality engineering at financial firms? Visit our dedicated Regulation & Compliance page here.
READ MORE
- Inside banking’s shift to smarter QA to tackle complexity and risk
- SmartBear CPTO on AI in banking QA: ‘Impressive metrics but no critical scenarios’
- Banks push beyond traditional QA as resilience testing gains ground
- Banking QA professionals warn AI still doesn’t know ‘where the bodies are buried’
- RECAP: The QA Financial Healthcare & Insurance Forum Philadelphia 2026
WATCH NOW
QA FINANCIAL PODCASTS
CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO OUR EXCLUSIVE CONVERSATIONS
